Committee comes up: just consider what is already known.
If Earth were indeed flat, the answers become impossible. I consult The Committee anyway, because the real question is: why does anybody suggest it? C: "Much confusion, thus distraction, is created. By doing so, it becomes much easier to float other false distractions as truth. Belief motivates humans. The objective is to deceive many people into supporting things, such as global warming climate change, by way of generating discussions and uncertainties about something as ridiculous as a flat planet. The false but more reasonable sound of the objective is far easier to digest once the populace is accustomed to seeing ridiculousness. The active, voluminous discussions & attention about & given to homosexual marriage, transgenderism and fringe social topics, which shall directly involve only small single digit percentages of the population, serve to make the more insidious change easier among the larger, critical mass portions of human populations." ==================================================== RQ: I read an article today about NASA pushing the manned moon landing back until 2026. I was under the impression that we (humans) no longer had the capability/technology to safely cross the Van Allen belt. From what I remember, we accidentally stumbled upon that 'technology' from a crashed alien craft but no longer have that capability/technology today. I would appreciate your input on this topic. Thank you. A: We humans have had the technology to protect against radiation since very shortly after discovering what radiation is, i.e. radioactive particles. The challenge is weight; a manned spacecraft with sufficiently thick lead shielding (or other very heavy metal) would not be able to achieve orbit, given rocket booster technology of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Our rockets have not gotten much more powerful since then, but mostly more efficient. (Automobiles are similar; a current large Chevrolet vehicle significantly outweighs a Cadillac from the 1960s, but with "only" a 5.3 liter engine. The "Caddy" six decades ago had a 7 liter then a 7.7 liter guzzler under the hood but made less power than the modern General Motors 5.3 engine. In a drag race, the Chevrolet of today at 2600 kg would show its taillights pretty quickly to the 7.7 liter, 2,000 kg Cadillac .) The Committee says the postponement of the mission is for both political and scientific reasons; the ongoing process to develop light enough radiation shielding material is half of the reason given to project staff & leaders, and is correct. The other half is political, the risk of bad publicity and the effect that might have on the election in November of this year. RQ: So if lead is too heavy, what did they use to protect the astronauts for the manned moon missions in the 60's? A: Investigators discovered inside crashed alien ET vessels or ships, many items, materials and devices, among them a foil made from an unknown alloy and elements, which do not exist on Earth. The foil blocks high intensity radiation better than 30cm/12 in thick lead, with the weight of aluminum foil and twice the thickness (30 microns) of typical aluminum foil (15 microns) sold at a supermarket. The problem became removing and installing it again and again; we can't repair it by, for example, by melting it down and recycling it. We don't have this element on Earth, thus do not know its properties and would risk losing all of it. Using it to shield a returning capsule that passes through the Van Allen Belts to re-enter the atmosphere, where the exterior surfaces get really, really hot, especially across the ceramic heat shield (even a small gap in foil coverage could allow enough radiation to enter and seriously injure or kill the astronauts) then splashing down on the ocean's surface? Plus removal and re-attachment to a new space capsule? All that work took its toll on the stuff. We don't have any more of it; no other nation does. No more manned missions above the Van Allen Belts have occurred in a half century.
11 Comments
A reader question in the comments brought about an answer too long for that page, in my opinion.
================================================================================== RQ: So would this be mainly back-to-back incarnations in the same family, to continue a task started but not finished with the souls left behind in the flesh, so to speak? C: It can be, but no, the sequence does not have to be, or is not required to be, or isn’t scheduled the way you describe, for the majority of instances which might be included in what the question describes. RQ: For example, the great grandfather that comes back as his great grandson, like e.g. died in 2018 and born again in 2021? C: This is possible and has been done. RQ: Or could there even be overlaps such as being born e.g. only five months after one’s death? C: Overlaps are not possible for humans but yes in Heaven. RQ: What would that mean for the baby in the mother’s womb, would there be a soul holding the place while waiting for the other soul to leave the dying body and be free to take its place in the new body? C: In Heaven babies do not exist, because humans do not exist. Time does not exist; a soul is not able to wait, because doing so requires the passage of time. Time does not exist; it is an Earth surface illusion. For the purpose of answering your question, no; no soul is obligated to wait for anything where time does not exist. The human body is subject to time, therefore souls who wish to use a human body become subject to the restrictions and limitations time creates. Souls can leave a body and have another soul enter and take over the life contract, although rare, but any soul can enter any body not occupied or used by another soul, with permission of all souls involved. This is easy to do mechanically, because your soul departs your body nearly every time you sleep, and almost one hundred percent of the time you sleep for many hours, such as overnight. The process of departure and return, for sleeping overnight, is no more easy or difficult physically than final soul departure, or first entry. Allow us a comparison; it is physically no more easy or difficult to shoot a water pistol into the face of the prime minister during a meeting of government ministers, than to shoot the water stream into the face of one’s friend during a party. Knowledge of circumstances and consequences matter greatly. RQ: And if either of these two options in the example were possible, what would that mean for the soul of the great grandfather, would it still be there for the souls of the other older family members when they return home or even during their lifetimes, as support from the other side of the veil, so to speak? C: We shall speak to incarnation from the perspective of Heaven and your soul, explaining again what we have already done, as some readers might recall. We ask that you envision the spoked wheel of a bicycle. Each spoke represents a sequence of events in which a soul participates. This wheel has thousands of spokes, and one of them, possibly two, are incarnations in a certain place or upon a certain planet. The spokes are often connected by small segments attached to two or more, which run perpendicular to the spokes. These small pieces are human life contracts and experiences. You may create a life agreement, and place another small segment of either a spoke, or a connecting piece attached to both running between them. You can approach and review any one of these pieces, and you can look at the spoke from the wheel center or from the outer rim towards the center hub. The spokes and segments between them represent Earth time, which for you on the surface of your planet, are fixed, permanent and always progressing in the same direction. Your soul neither has nor needs such restrictions; time does not exist for your soul. Incarnation can be planned and carried out just as your example postulates, or in any other combination, always subject to the limits a human body and the Earth surface environment place upon a body. RQ: Hope these questions make sense, but I have often wondered about that. C: Do you hope to say that you would like the questions to generate answers you will like, or with which you will agree? Making sense as humans say these words, often means that. How much or little sense we have made turns on your interpretation of our replies. Overall, what we wish to say is, souls cannot create a body without agreement from two other souls who agree to be parents and perform the biological function or process to create the body the incoming soul will occupy. Two souls may inhabit the same body, but this is never done against the will of the one soul or the other. Humans call this schizophrenia or multiple personality disorder. It is uncommon because of the freedom from time constraints makes it unnecessary. Your soul can incarnate in the Earth's Roman Empire, or during Atlantis, or two thousand years from now and in any order. The human sequence does not apply away from or off Earth. This ease of placement makes the purpose of dual or triple occupation of a body meaningless, unless all souls involved, all incarnated family for example, agree to do it because a specific and beneficial task, lesson and mission will result, which could not be done otherwise." Playing hooky is mid to late 20th century (and earlier) American slang for skipping school, being away from classes without permission. If incarnation aboard Earth is schooling & education, could that make a soul's absence from our true home a form of "playing hooky" or, the other way around? The phrase probably came from the Dutch word "hoekje" for the game of hide & seek. Do we incarnate to temporarily hide from ourselves, in order to seek experience, knowledge and understanding we cannot otherwise get without playing the Earth game?
Responds The Committee:
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = The dream you remember is from another lifetime, what in your case would be a future life. Already lived along the calendar used in the life you now lead, the beauty is something which awaits not in this life but another. To the questions we proceed: 1) Many, too numerous to mention, list or explain here 2) Your desire for the list is impressive. 3) This depends on what best means for the possessor of the crystal 4) Your intent is what matters, not just the stone. As many elements as humans have identified for Earth, called the Periodic Table of the Elements, do exist compounds of crystalline structure. From salt to diamonds, snowflakes to coal, your planet offers so many crystalline structures and compounds which allow them to form, that we could write an encyclopedia. The subject can be investigated for much human time, for much has been written. Brief shall we be: all physical objects have a resonant frequency, the atomic structure of which decides what the sound, light and other energy input will best affect. Leaded crystal glass plus certain sound, are but one small example. Crystals, by virtue and result of the crystalline structure molecules adopt, respond to energy of many types; sound, light and electrical. Crystals also respond to the energy of the human soul. Choose the crystal you like, for the look, shape, function and ways in which you plan to wear or use it. What matters the most, are your belief and clarity of purpose; for what benefit do you wish to have and use a crystal? Focus your energy —this means your thoughts— upon it, to observe the effects and improvements you wish. Be patient but only for a few days; you shall see. Looks, color and setting might seem superfluous, but they are not; these qualities are magnets for your good mental energy, thus help bring about effects desired. The best stone for you and your purpose, is the one you like, by shape, color, size and setting or use. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The discovery of the Roman dodecahedron simply reminds us of how stupid we are The recent discovery reminds us of how advanced the Romans were, before it all went horribly wrong for Britain The Telegraph, 14 January 2024 Story by William Sitwell There were two big mysteries in the news this week. First there was the discovery of a Roman dodecahedron in a field in Lincolnshire and second there was the question of what happened to Michael Gove’s forehead. And, I would add, are the two issues connected? The dodecahedron find means that 120 such knobbly-objects have now been discovered across Europe, from the Netherlands to the UK, Germany to Austria. With this latest object unearthed near the village of Norton Disney, close to the site of a Roman villa discovered in 1923, 33 of varying sizes, from a golf to a cricket ball, have been found in Britain alone. It has, as they all do, left people scratching their heads. Indeed, it emerges that Lorena Hitchens – a doctoral student at Newcastle University whose PhD concerns dodecahedra – says that they “are some of the least understood objects to survive from the Roman Empire,” adding: “The Romans don’t mention these at all – no inscriptions, no writings, no pictorial depictions, nothing.” Which leads to an even greater mystery, perhaps, on how she’s managing to get 80,000 words done on not knowing what the hell they are. This find comes exactly 12 months after a metal detectorist found the fragment of another such object in a ploughed field in northern Flanders (and yes, I’ve also just got the chills having realised that Toby Jones – a hitherto, completely unheard of British character actor, now the most powerful man in Britain – starred in the TV series The Detectorists …) The objects are things of intricate beauty and fascination. They are hollow, have 12 sides and there are large holes in each face and round studs in each corner. A curator at the Gallo-Roman Museum in the Belgium city of Tongeren has speculated that they could be instruments to measure land, a calendar or an object related to sorcery or fortune telling. But, says Guido Creemers: “none of [the hypotheses] is [are] satisfying.” It is also intriguing to think that these objects were quite common, in that so many have survived, but the fact that we have no clue about what they were used for is a salient reminder about our place in history. Humans, across time, always tend to think that they are living in the greatest period, the moment of keenest discovery, of advancement in civilisation, of peak intellect. It’s a bit like how people regard restaurants. Terence Conran said in 1997: “There has never been a more exciting time to eat out.” The critic Michael Winner once wrote of “the golden period of the 1950s, when food tasted like it was meant to be.” In 1791, Samuel Johnson wrote that: “there is nothing which yet been contrived by man by which so much happiness is produced, as by a good tavern or inn.” And William Fitzstephen, in 1170, talked of a public eating house where “every thing desirable is instantly procured”. The dodecahedron reminds us of how advanced the Romans were. They had underfloor heating, built roads and aqueducts, invented cement, had a functioning postal service, bound books, invented the Julian calendar, spread a unified currency across the empire, were hospitable to strangers, had a very relaxed attitude to sex and promiscuity, had an extremely good sense of humour (have you seen the graffiti in Pompeii?) and had enormous fun down at the circus. Then it all went horribly wrong and Britain was plunged into the Dark Ages. Civilisation declined for hundreds of years (you couldn’t get a table in a decent restaurant, let alone with a tablecloth, until the 1400s) and the story was one of frequent bouts of extreme violence perpetrated by Saxons, Vikings and Normans. Then fast forward to today, an era in which we celebrate the idiocy forced upon children that is the iPad, denying them of the chance to think and create, we fight wars creating unimaginable suffering and you can’t get a cone of decent ice-cream on any British high street. Give the average person a Celtic Romano dodecahedron and ask them – Clive Anderson’s Whose Line is it Anyway style – to imagine and improvise its use and they’ll probably just chuck it at someone, with all the brains of a Neanderthal. Which is possibly what happened to Michael Gove. Having (no doubt) fiercely castigated his ex-wife Sarah Vine, for describing in The Spectator – and in doing so breaking the last taboo – who was at the Garrick one evening over Christmas (Kwasi Kwarteng, his wife, their vicar, Lord Howard, Lord Winston and Sting) she would have puffed, shrugged her shoulders yelled something like – “Oh do shut up you pompous idiot’” – and, grabbing the nearest object, a 1,600 year old dodecahedron, flung it at him and caused some very satisfying and temporary scarring. ©️ The Telegraph 14 January 2024 ~ END OF NEWS ARTICLE ~
Sayeth The Committee: These dodecahedrons are art objects, decorations. The objects symbolise calcite crystals used to amplify electricity into light, are Atlantean in origin and much older than the Roman civilisation. Only a small fraction have been found, most destroyed during the destruction of Atlantis. The objects were quite popular. The knobs were included on corners to prevent them from rounding off and to make the objects sit easily on more surfaces than level, flat ones. The holes in each pentagon allow them to be made hollow easily. The openings represent entry & exit of electricity and light pulses produced. Human life dies, but our souls are e-mail; it & we are forever. Watch this video (about twelve minutes) to see what prompted a reader's questions and the response from The Committe, which follow. Asks a reader:
Sayeth The Committee: Better would it be to describe the lower, middle and upper astral zones "as options, choices and variable selections" says The Committee. They continue: "Any soul may visit or inhabit any of such areas OR also create another. Within these general areas, the width, depth and breadth of possibilities are endless, all of it able to be reached instantly. All that is required, is knowledge of the location." "Bear in mind, the human notions of up and down, created by Earth's surface and the sky above, added to gravity acting upon the body and all things physical, do not apply in Heaven, the true and permanent home of a soul. The environment and surroundings which Earth offers, are merely an option and choice, and only a minority of souls occupy such environments in Heaven and even then, only for visits, not permanent stays. S/he who has a house, lake and boats is merely there temporarily, but the visit can seem as permanent as anything in existence. It can be dissolved away in an instant or left for others to enjoy, and will remain solid and fixed forever, if not swept away by the thoughts of its creator. The reference to a soul remaining in the middle astral region is for a soul who has already chosen to re-incarnate and is merely making a pit stop, visiting there for a time. Once returned to Heaven, a soul need not –and most do not– have Guardian Angel Guides. Once a soul comes to see and accepts that human life has ended, Guardian Angel Guides step out of and away from that role, returning to being close, intimate friends. The lower astral description is the smallest zone, area or region, by quantity of souls, that exists in Heaven and is microscopically miniscule by comparison. It is tied and tethered to Earth or any planet or place where the soul has just passed through an incarnation experience, because of the preferences of the souls who select it. This area most closely resembles Earth and offers the illusion of Earth surface solidity. True solidity is Heaven, and Earth environment physicality is the illusion. On Earth humans and all things choose the opposite perception, against reality." The volume of commentary regarding Hamas, Palestinian Arabs and Israel are a marketer's dream-come-true. Questions for The Committee would be great, too. Let's stay in that part of the world, in the area now called the West Bank (of the Dead Sea). In English, Yeshua's day-of-birth visitors are called simply The Three Wise Men but in other languages Melchior, Caspar and Balthazar are named the Magic Kings, hailing from Persia, India and Arabia, respectively. Did they pay a visit two weeks ago on the 25th of December or did it yesterday, the 6th of January? What made them so wise to follow a star? In their shoes (or sandals probably) I'd think I'd been spotted by a stealth mode silent running police helicopter's searchlight; I would NOT follow it. On to the post of the day:
A few labels from many languages humans apply to the rising & setting sun, also Earth's laps 'round it. Love or hate calendars --or accept without friendship or animosity-- nearly all of us use 'em, plus subparts labeled hours, minutes and seconds. (Timex, Rolex and Switzerland overall, send much gratitude.) Human lives are really just a number line; 20–30,000 sunrises are not unusual; so far, I've been through more than 22,800. Your mileage may vary. We count laps around the sun from a starting point upon which we all agree --circles don't begin or end-- and we really like to count sun laps we've personally racked up, starting the day we're born; any excuse to eat a cake will do. The day after tomorrow marks another agreed starting point, for Decade 202, lap 4 of 10 within.
What can The Committee tell us about impending world events during, as today's speakers of Romanian, Italian, French, Portuguese, Spanish & The Romans before them, call "Ring Two Zero Two Four" ?
Speed of Light: 299,792 kilometers per second
Latitude of Giza: 29.9792 ⁰ North Coincidence ? Says The Committee: "The placement was intentional, for this specific reason." Reader questions, six of 'em: 6️⃣😉 ◆ In Heaven, we can be an orb, a beam of light, or we can wear a body? C: All three but these are possibilities for your appearance, not your essence. You can always be, but never be anything else. Appearance changes, options, alternatives and choices are unlimited. Most commonly are you a point of light. When departing the body for the daily, or nightly, visit home, you most often show up as a point of light. ◆ Since we hear without ears and see without eyes as an orb or beam of light, what function would eyes have in any body we can wear? C: Decoration, which is what a body offers in Heaven. ◆ Do we just make the eyes work while in that heavenly body? Because surely we would look at each other while in bodies? C: The eyes a body offers are decoration only; sight is not provided with, by or through them. ◆ Do we see human type bodies? Extraterrestrial type bodies? Both? Whatever we choose to see? C: Yes, in the souls who wish to wear one, yes if chosen and also anything else chosen. The bodies of souls incarnated are also seen and are also chosen. ◆ I hear there are animals in Heaven. Are they just souls who prefer to wear animal bodies? C: Yes. Animals as humans understand them, do not exist in Heaven as a basic, fundamental or default condition. ◆ I really enjoy watching good TV shows, nature docos, science, sporting events, music concerts, entertainment. Can we still do this in Heaven? Can we watch such shows still? C: Just as is done now. All things humans produce can be observed in Heaven, and are.
|