Reader questions about The Orient express-addressed. (See what I did there?) 😉 ![]()
15 Comments
![]()
Is the post title's second word a noun or verb? Read on Grammar Gods, in order to know. Before we explore God, nine (9) universal reader questions: 😊9️⃣♻♻♻ ![]()
Are they just another name for timelines? Let's ask The Committee to explain.
Q: Esteemed Committee, our recent discussion of timelines brought out the comment that we might discuss and possibly explore parallel universes. As I just asked above, is this a different name for timelines, sequences of events? C: Greetings and our welcome we again extend to you all, to whom these words come. No. Q: What is a parallel universe? C: Another universe, of which nine exist. Q: Can physical objects of any dimension in our universe travel to or between them? C: No. Q: Can our souls do it? C: Yes, but rarely. Q: How would a soul get to another one? C: Through what humans have named a black hole. Q: A timeline, a sequence of events arranged in specific order, is different how? C: These two things cannot be compared. Timelines as humans understand them, can only exist inside or within a time sequence framework created by shifting light angles. Human clocks simply imitate Earth rotation. Other time sequences can exist where the same effect occurs, such as on the surface a planet orbiting a star. This has nothing to do with another universe. Q: What then is the appeal or reason for using the term parallel universe? C: The distortion perception of time applying everywhere. It does not exist in most locations in any universe. Q: Why does a soul ever go to another universe? C: To return to God, the true creator of all our existence. Q: Shouldn’t we all want to go there? C: No, you were created and sent to the universe you inhabit for specific reasons and purpose, to enhance God and make it better. Returning makes you less; it makes you disappear. You become part of God again and lose what your soul has. God does not want this; neither do you. Does a tree wish to die, disappear and return to being just the seed from the tree which created that seed? Q: The human desire to explore, unpack, understand and know about something is nearly irresistible. Suggesting anything is either off-limits or unavailable, produces the opposite effect; we then want it more. Why is not recommended for a parallel universe or return to God? C: You already know all about it; you benefit in no way, and lose in large ways. Q: By travelling to a parallel universe, we lose our soul? C: Yes, and God does not want this. ![]()
If not immediately familiar, "PSA" = public service announcement. 😊
A reader asks: In the fourth quarter this year [2021] a fourth vaccine called Novavax could be approved for emergency use for COVID19, suggesting a release during first quarter 2022. Supposedly based on established vaccine technology (no genetic alteration, etc.) would this be a safe alternative if we must be vaccinated for work or other bullshit reasons? I get the impression this reader dislikes forced vaccines. 🤨 Replies The Committee: "....safer genetically but what 'safe' means remains relative. It will be much safer as far as DNA modification, but what other ingredients or components are included with it, must be considered before general safety can be judged for any one person." "We understand what you ask, because you expect that we know the composition of the vaccines, which we do. This vaccine will not be risk free, but will be much less likely to cause the problems already seen with existing mRNA type injections, or the longer term issues which have yet to become widespread and well known, caused by the mRNA inoculations. "The other ingredients in this latest vaccine can cause allergic and other adverse reactions in people who are aware of the likelihood already, or will discover sensitivity to the other components about which they did not know. "In your case, this newer vaccine will represent much less risk for you, by comparison. Make certain you are not substituted an mRNA shot. Insist on seeing the stockpile of vials and be allowed to select the one you receive. Inform yourself well as to the appearance of the vial and label." A reader asked for a basic explanation. I understand many of you might already know this, parts of it or a lot more & accurate information, but nevertheless:
▶ Viruses or bacteria, neutralized or dead, are injected to trigger the immune system enough to develop immunity but not enough live or active microbes are delivered to cause disease. Viruses are not alive, but bacteria are indeed living organisms. Think of a virus as a computer memory chip, such as an SD card. It contains no initial data of its own. It does nothing until inserted into a working computer, then it functions. ▶ Some microbes are frozen or exposed to ultraviolet light, and/or come included with other substances which function as inhibitors. The yellow fever virus is an example of a vaccine with active intruders but other substances to vastly slow replication, so the immune system can identify and design a successful counterattack before symptoms and contagiousness develop. Influenza vaccines contain neutralized viruses. ▶ The immune system remembers intruder viruses or bacteria. It re-generates required cells which best attack the invaders. Until now, this is what vaccines have been. ▶ The current vaccine is NOT of this type; it is a genetic modifier which re-programs the immune system DNA. It encloses RNA (RiboNucleic Acid) inside a lipid (fat molecules). ▶ RNA is similar to DNA (Deoxy-riboNucleic Acid) but RNA is single-stranded. DNA has a twisted, helix like double strand. RNA is but a messenger. The challenge is, despite many years of development, that mRNA (messenger RiboNucleic Acid) has not been administered to so many humans. The side effects started immediately; blood clots, menstrual cycle anomalies, heart problems and dead people. The big question is, how many of each, how long before the effects showed up and what nobody knows yet: how long will "long term" become, and what ELSE will develop? I want the Committee to lay all this out like unrolling a packet of tools, but I get silence. Just like I received no advance warning about Afghanistan or what would and has now developed over the past two weeks. Asking about the country now, The Committee says only "worsening and soon, before things get better". The last post had interesting remarks & comments. It was a fine example of free speech. I've chewed on a wide variety of newspapers, (remember those?) magazines & trade journals across several continents in several languages. As a result, I don't believe free speech is best exercised before disagreements commence. This is the one MASSIVE advantage websites, weblogs and internet forums provide; reader discussions. Often good & revealing —even if too high a price to pay— is the censorship & shutdowns certain "service providers" impose when they cannot accept different ideas. Remarks & comments are edited & erased, including videos, channels and even entire platforms. During the recent give & take of reader comments here, the topic of timelines came up. Let's explore that, along with a Q&A session on vaccines, in the attached post. First a reader question for The Committee: "Mr Magoo" (yes, that's the name used to send the anonymous question, and in case it isn't immediately familiar [i.e. you're not a baby boomer American or Canadian] Mr. Magoo is a fictional cartoon character created in 1949, an elderly, well off, short-statured retiree alumnus of the same college from which I graduated [Rutgers] who becomes entangled in comical situations because of strong near-sightedness and stubborn refusal to admit problems. [This sounds like the same male menopause syndrome which has affected yours truly, except I'm not near sighted and prefer a different style of hat]) asks: I've been reading about retired football (soccer) players increasingly being diagnosed with dementia due to repeatedly heading the ball over a long career. Would The Committee have any nutritional advice that we can use to prevent dementia and other neurological conditions please? C: "All sports with cranial impacts can bring about brain conditions, boxing the most common, American football next, then hockey then rugby besides football played all over Earth. Our advice is more than nutritional; avoiding head impacts and sports which involve them, is our first recommendation, then maintain good health overall. Lowered blood pressure is ideal; avoidance, prevention and cures for hypertension are already well known by human medical science. For diet we recommend reduction of inflammation from regular consumption of oils, olive and other pressed, but not chemically extracted ones, nuts, ginger, garlic, onion, turmeric, hot pepper, green leafy vegetables of all types and fresh, unprocessed fruits, again of a wide variety & assortment of both. Low, infrequent consumption of alcohol, sugars and chemically processed foods of any type, is also ideal. Brown, whole grain versus bleached rice or flour are two among many examples. These foods and ingredients will have general health benefit far beyond prevention or reduction of dementia. Exercise is also ideal for dementia prevention, and can be a big contributor. Many humans include progressive decline of cognitive and mental acuity in their life plan, such as now afflicts the forty sixth USA president. The onset of this condition is not a guarantee, unless the human life plan has included this condition as an absolute event, in spite of all incarnated efforts against it. Remember always, life and birth both bring about fatal consequences. Live excitement as soon and as long as possible." ![]()
![]()
Reader "Derek Domino" anonymously asks: (yes, that was the name used to send the question 🙂)
Dear [Committee]: Are the PCR swabs, sterilized using Ethylene Oxide, safe? Thank you for your feedback. I'm due to have a test and I'm concerned about it but don't feel I can trust the Internet fact check sites. My context: Nothing is "safe" if the negative thing arising out of it, happens to you. The rates of occurrence of negative things might be low, but bad outcomes always happen when > 100 million people are involved. Is driving a car safe? Millions of people doing it daily, suggest it is. Ask the families and close friends of the 30-35,000 people who perish in motor vehicle related crashes in just the USA (it happens everywhere cars are used). I will go out on a limb and bet that group of people, family & friends of victims, believe cars are dangerous. For anyone not immediately familiar with PCR, it is a polymerase chain reaction test performed to detect genetic material from a specific organism, such as a virus. The test detects the presence from the sample, and could also detect virus fragments after the infection ends; i.e. symptoms disappear and no more virus replication, discharge, emanation or exhalation occurs. The Committee says: This depends on frequency of exposure to ethylene oxide and cumulative amounts. If the small quantity used to sterilize a cotton swab is the extent of exposure, no harm will arise. Continued, ongoing exposure, such as in a chemical manufacturing environment, laboratory or production of the ethylene oxide itself, significantly increases the risk of cancer. The better and harmless method for sterilizing a swab is exposure to the ultraviolet C spectrum. This is known but more expensive, requiring use of a device to make the light, plus protection methods to safeguard humans from exposure to it. Insertion of an item to be sterilized inside a closed box where the light is contained inside, is safe. We suggest you make the process simple and inexpensive; bring your own small amount of vodka; dip the untreated swab into it, squeeze out excess with sterile gauze, then allow to dry. |