Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
10 Comments
The Trump Assassination Attempt is now located a few days back on at least one human calendar. Details, opinions and mucho analysis have been offered since, but nothing I’ve seen has been as good as this excellent reader question.
Your host’s (i.e. my) first question, what grabbed my attention as details arrived. was the turn of President Trump’s head. Given the would-be assassin's position, distance and type of rifle/ammunition used means the bullet traveled from muzzle to target in about 1/7 of one second, meaning the shooter had already taken aim and decided to fire but squeezed the trigger not knowing Mr. Trump would turn his head to the right as it was done. Had the head turn not happened, the slug would have passed through both sides of the cranium plus everything in between and the target would have collapsed pretty much immediately from such fatal injury. My guides have told me that Guardian Angels of both shooter and target, young Mr. Crooks and not-as-young Mr. Trump, coordinated the turn of the head along with the trigger pull. My additional questions follow this great one from a reader. RQ: Can we get some word from the spirit [what] this [assassination attempt on President Trump] means going forward for humankind? "..the spirit…" is a not-so-precise or even a vague buzzword. "The spirit" is composed of souls, each one just as unique as is & are each human; groups of souls are just like human groups, because we are all souls ourselves. (This means we are not humans who have souls, we are souls temporarily playing human.) It would be easy to see my comment as critical of the questioner but that is the OPPOSITE of my reaction. The question is fantastic, as it once again highlights and emphasizes the human perspective, how we humans can improve information coming from sources not playing but most definitely observing humans and participating in Earthbound societies. Says The Committee, who are "the spirit" to which the reader could be referring: "First unpack we shall your word choice. You have offered us words and asked for same in return; happy we are to oblige. 'Some word' might mean not all words, or not the complete story, however the reader questioner has not suggested which portions of the story to address and provide meaning; these might include background of the would-be assassin, accomplices, the plan hatched, the events of the day, national and international reaction and the effect on USA presidential politics. From this list we shall select, address and thus ask that the original questioner add questions if so inclined, please also do the same you other readers. The host’s comment as to precision and detail of question remain. The shooter was identified, lured, indoctrinated and incentivized over time. The relatively lax security resulted from complacent negligence it would seem. This was not as casual as it looks, the event was planned as part of the life plans of souls involved, with a greater purpose, which is: to demonstrate to mankind the lengths to which certain interests, the hidden controlling powers we have often discussed, will go to knock down threats, eliminate challenges to their positions and attempt to perpetuate the power to which they have become hopelessly addicted. Human desires to either support or oppose them are beside the point, to perpetrators of the indoctrination and brainwashing. Pawns in such a process, in this case the shooter, are taken advantage of without regard to the effect upon them. The hidden powers do not care who loses or what is lost, including human life, when it comes to maintenance of their power and position. Outsider observers, voters, citizens and others observing, are but many small chess pieces to be controlled. Backing away from the many details, we encourage readers to consider the case; why would the relatively young shooter believe there existed a chance the act could be committed but not result in his own death? Because he was assured sufficiently well, often enough and in ways he believed, that the horrible outcome for him was unlikely. He believed the attention, notoriety and status resulting from this incident were worth the effort. To this we add, the spiritual objective was and is to show voters and citizens at least, and to the many observers around the world, the lengths to which opposition will go to control the human political process." Q: Some months ago, a reader here asked about attempts on the lives of world leaders; was this attempt known when that question was asked? C: Yes, and we shall point out now, we did not provide a specific answer as to how many in total. The decisions to proceed then attempt to carry out such acts were not final as of the time the question was asked. Q: How was the shooter identified by handlers as sufficiently vulnerable, that such approach might work? C: Free speech, in this case through websites and forums dealing with the political process and candidates. Handlers pose as members ideologically aligned with certain ideas and preferences, which gives opportunity to develop what humans might call a pen-pal relationship. This opens the door and also provides anonymity; it is easy to conceal identity in such environments. Q: Are such incursions always being tried? C: Of course, with knowledge that most will not be successful. As can be seen from this incident, the move came very close to achieving the goal set forth by handlers. Q: Ultimately, the HCPs? C: Yes. Q: How can they remain hidden, insulated from investigation and implications of involvement in the conspiracy? C: This is done through layers of contacts, all of which operate much as does electricity through an electronic device called a diode. The information flows one way but not the other. Any attempt to identify the source runs into a dead end. Q: How were the protectors led to be sufficiently negligent as to overlook the rooftop, and to respond too slowly to alerts provided by observers attending or looking on? C: The surface explanations will focus on negligence, born from complacence but there was a spiritual component also. Q: Did the Guardian Angels of the shooter know he would be killed on the spot? C: Yes, and attempted to make the shooter see where his affirmative choices would lead. We use that word to emphasize the human English language verb “lead”. At each step the shooter acted independently, driven to eventual approval thus acceptance by like minded people. These like-minded encouragers deceived him terribly. Q: How is this possible? C: The absence of insulation. To guard against incursions into bad behavior and modification towards it, all humans require love, acceptance and companionship. This applies without exception, because this is your natural home, you are always loved, adored and valued. The human experience allows these connections to appear suspended to the degree that such connection is sometimes believed non-existent or impossible to achieve. Criminal gangs, organizations and many such groups of humans thrive on the participation of members who find, through membership and sharing of group activity, the acceptance and companionship which has not come to them through family, friends and other people with whom they work, study, play and generally interact. This basic human need for love is more than sufficiently strong to overcome harm done to others required to achieve inclusion in the bad actor groups. The prevention of such harm, violence, acts of rage and anger directed at other humans, is easy and simple to achieve; love others as you would love yourself. This affection is and will be returned magnified; the process will build impenetrable walls against hurting other people. ========================================================= Now for unrelated reader questions recently received. RQ2. Is the story of Noah's Ark and the flood true and if so, how big was the Ark and how many animals did he take with him? C: Yes, well documented and the ship was full. RQ3. Was the Ark located in Turkey as has been reported or is that some other vessel? C: Yes, what has become Turkey. RQ4. Is it true fire and brimstone fell on Sodom and Gomorrah and Lot's wife turned into a pillar of salt after looking back? C: Brimstone or sulfur burns steadily and is difficult to extinguish, so much of it remained illuminated in the disaster which brought about the destruction of Atlantis and the massive ocean waves which were what is now called the Great Flood. The disaster was the impact of a comet turned meteor. The woman was burned, this effect appearing to be conversion into a crystalline substance resembling salt. The burning of human remains at lower temperatures produces much carbon thus black color, but at higher temperatures the process is quicker and prevents much carbonization, taken from atmospheric carbon dioxide, from occurring. RQ5. The bible states there is to be a second coming of Christ and the souls going to heaven will rise up out of their graves to join him. We are already in heaven so that doesn't make sense. Is this just another fable? C: Souls rise into Heaven long before a grave is involved, if humans even choose to create a place of bodily burial or interment. This is a fable concocted to control the masses; the general notions of organized religions offer that salvation and entrance into Heaven is dependent upon human behavior and compliance with human created principles, often wrapped up as God’s will. Many religious ideas offer that without following the teachings of the philosophy, a return to Heaven or entrance cannot be had. This is not true but is an easy notion to plant in the wake of what humans call heinous, bad or undesirable humans behavior or acts. The idea another human leader similar to Yeshua, or Buddha or Mohammed might arrive, to offer but three examples, serves to perpetuate the notion that a prophet’s leadership is an essential, required component. Once believed, it is not difficult to attribute extraordinary powers and authority to such a concept. The forecast of the return of a religious and supernatural leader is often sufficient to appeal to humans fear of rejection, upon actually seeing or meeting such a person. RQ6. Years ago reading "Channeling Erik" before I found this site, I believe he said that hell didn't exist but one's beliefs are what determines what happens after you died. If you did believe in hell and thought that was where you should go, it would be possible for you to create that type of existence for yourself. My question would be does a physical hell truly exist or is it something we can make up for ourselves because of our religious beliefs? C: No, there is no physical hell. The first part of the question is accurate; any soul creates its own hell, to the extent such a place can assist the soul in feeling thus understanding the reactions of other humas who were subject to a soul’s prior human actions. Allow us an example, given the recent questions about Mr. Trump and victims of the incident; whom is shot will have the feelings, sensations and emotions of the attack put back on the shooter, so that s/he may understand from the place of the victim(s), what the actions did. RQ7. This leads me to Satan. I think I remember Erik stating that Satan did exist but he is not as powerful as he is portrayed, so does he exist and did he take with him one third of the heavenly angels? What is he capable of doing wherever he is? C: Yes, he exists and no, he took no soul with him but himself. The notion a soul would be drawn that way is a story made up to control people away from the bad and towards the good. Satan is capable of the same things all souls can do. You who read these words are just as able to do or avoid what Satan might do. Fear nothing; you are protected completely, simply by wanting to be protected. Act honorably in all ways and Satan will be entirely repelled by your benevolence of thought and act. RQ8. We watch the Dead Files show sometimes and they are full of houses that are haunted by spirits, some harmful and some not. Who are these spirits and where do they come from? C: The souls of dead humans who have not accepted death of the body and their place in Heaven. RQ9. We looked at a house for sale and I had a very strong feeling that someone/something wanted me to leave. I've never felt this before or again. Can you tell me who or what that was? C: Your Guardian Angels wanted you to leave, it was not a good place for you to live. RQ10. Erik and his mother do a lot of crossed over individuals and they did an interview with Hitler which was very interesting. Seeing how it seems hell may not exist you would think that if it did, his spirit would be there. Erik and his mom said he had a very creepy low energy and that I think they said he was in a lower dimension? And that it will take him a long time to progress from this state. Is this so? C: Hell most certainly exists for Adolph Hitler, he went there and suffered immeasurably with the feelings of victims of the regime he lead. His salvation has come from the souls and their deep forgiveness of the suffering Hitler created. The low and creepy energy was a re-visit into what Hitler's soul held as a human. This is no longer. RQ11: Did Jesus really walk on the water? C: Yes. How did he accomplish that? I’ve read many papers /parts of the Urantia Book which in the past The Committee has said is accurate or true (as far as I remember) and yet in that book it says Jesus never walked on water. (See the comment in the post "Jesucristo" from the 6th of July for full explanation of the question.) C: All of you can walk on water, but for your belief this is not possible. The human understanding of buoyancy, mass and weight comes from the physical environment humans choose to occupy. Your soul assesses the environment of Earth and decides how much of the parameters of the vibrational range will be adopted, accepted or rejected. The effects and consequences of setting aside the constraints the human environment offers, such as gravity but many other limits apply, are weighed against the objectives souls wish to reach through the process and experience of incarnation. That so few humans ever observed Yeshua's walk across the surface of water, shows how irrelevant this ability was to his life purpose and activity. That other places have said no, this did not happen, is accurate because it did not happen in front of anyone already disposed to believe it cannot be done. It was not Yeshua's place to contradict, contravene or create conflict of ideas or beliefs in observers where the display of an apparent otherworldly ability would create confusion. Too many reader questions in the comments to be properly answered there.
================================================================== Q: Was Jesus really stabbed in the side? How did he survive that? C: The objective was to kill him slowly, to intimate the population and appease civil, religious leaders. Jesus was wounded in several ways, intended to bring about his death, in addition to having his feet and hands nailed through into wood. His survival was controlled by his Guardian Angel Guides while he was comatose. This was his life plan, certainly one option or choice. Q: The Bible says he appeared to many people. How did he do that if he was hurried out of the country? C: It was not his physical body that appeared to people who saw him, but his body was just what they saw, what Jesus intended would happen. Just as a person’s Guardian Angel Guides can appear and seem like a real human being. Such appearances happen much more frequently that most humans know, because the humans do not know or believe this is possible. Q: How was he able to remain unknown for many years when he was a teacher, born to teach? C: Jesus was not known away from the lands of his birth, his upbringing, his teaching and his preaching. In Europe he was unremarkable, unrecognizable and did not again speak publicly. His life’s mission and purpose were complete when the Romans crucified him. Q: When Jesus spoke and prayed to our Father, was He speaking and praying to all of us (all souls as a collective) or something more? C: Yes, of course, to all souls. There is nothing more. Q: What caused the image of Jesus to be imprinted into the shroud? C: The effect was discoloration of the cloth because of chemicals used to color it, ultraviolet light and time, a long, long time. Q: What is the actual date of birth of Jesus? C: By which calendar, we must ask. Use of the Gregorian calendar has become universal across Earth civilizations, so we will use it to reply. As is well known this calendar begins with Jesus Christ, so the answer, as accurate as any, is: Day 1 AD. Q: Where was Jesus and what was he doing during the so called "missing years" between the ages of 12 and 29? C: He was in Nazareth, Galilee and surrounding areas, living and working. As is well known, he was a carpenter. Q: Did Jesus ever visit Tibet / Nepal / India or some eastern countries as some theories suggest? C: No. Q: Mary [Magdalene} said in the interview that Joseph was not the father....." .... Shouldn't this be Jesus's "Mother Mary" and not Mary Magdalene? C: Yes, both his mother and mate were named Mary. Both women knew this, so the answer would be correct for either one. Q: So, Jesus was part European after all. C: No, not by current ideas and standards of racial and social heritage, legacy and descendance. Q: Is there a tomb of Jesus somewhere in France? C: No. Q: Did Jesus really walk on the water? C: Yes. Q: Were his disciples aware that Jesus was living in France after resurrection? Did they ever get in touch with Jesus again? C: Two went with him, who were not part of his usual group and are unknown as such, even to this day. Jesus was taken to what became France, in the southern region of the nation, because of fear his presence in the north of what became Italy, where Cortina is now located, would be discovered. Yeshua never had any contact, written or in person, with anyone who remained in what are now called the Holy Lands, what is now called Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt. Praise Be To Jesus, Lord Have Mercy.
(I am not being sarcastic; I admire strongly religious folks among the world's Christian Clans.) H = Host Q = Reader Question C = The Committee Q1. I think we've all heard some believe Jesus survived and escaped to live in Europe marrying Mary Magdalene and having descendants in France and UK. I think he is believed to have lived to be 72 so I'm wondering if any or all of this is true? (Jesus said in the interview he had no live descendants presently here, they have all passed.) H: For we & us who are aware of, have read or know something about the bible (or The Bible) this is a yes, but “we’ve all heard” only covers a minority of mankind, by a short stretch. This topic has been covered here before, some readers might remember or even look it up. I’m happy to travel the road again. Yeshua went into a coma after the crucifixion (Good Friday) and was presumed dead. When he regained consciousness a few days later (Easter Sunday) Yeshua was wrapped up to disguise his identity, taken to what became Italy, then farther west into what became France, where he lived the rest of his days and nights until he died many years later, in obscurity. The Committee is not giving details such as age at death, hair style, shoe size or favorite food, from before or after Jesus re-settled. Q2. Did Jesus actually die and come back to life or just slowed his vitals down in order to seem dead as I have heard? (Mary in her interview said she believed that he was actually dead.) H: As mentioned, coma. C: Yes, Jesus was believed dead. He was taken away to be buried quickly, as was and remains the Hebrew tradition, which arose from the risk of rapid decomposition of remains. Yeshua was revived by his GAGs to stop it from happening. His disciples and others surrounding him kept quiet, because they knew what would happen to them if word of the revival reached Pontius Pilate. Q3. Did angels (two I think) roll away the stone at the tomb? C: No, humans did this. Q4. Mary [Magdalene} said in the interview that Joseph was not the father, but she had been assaulted by a Roman soldier. (I found his name was Panthera on line.) She said it was a case where something bad had been turned into something good. Is there any truth to this? (This was a bit of a shock when all these years you think it was an immaculate conception.) C: Yes, to the Roman soldier question, several participated in the incident. Mary did not attempt to fight them off physically; she understood the Romans would injure her severely, that her attempts to stop them would not work. A human female pregnancy without sexual intimacy is virtually impossible without medical procedures to create it. Q5. Did the parting of the Red Sea actually happen? (Twice I think I read.) C: Yes, it was a lowering of the sea level caused by extremely strong gravitational forces from a passing object in space, which caused a seaquake and tsunami which temporarily drew ocean water away at the same time. Q6. The part about Jesus being God's only begotten son doesn't make sense. Aren't we all parts and children of God? C: Yes, this true because we are all God, we create the collective which is what God is. The biblical story offered is a human creation intended to enhance or create human beliefs, devotion, membership and obedience. Q7. What about the star of Bethlehem and the three wise men, is that fact? I just read recently Jesus may have been born in Nazareth. C: Yes, Yeshua was visited by the leaders, who were interested in determining if the rumors, stories and speculation about a special baby truly referred to an actual baby; they wanted to see if this infant did exist, which he did. The star of Bethlehem was not a star, it was the planet you now call Venus. Q9. Is there any truth to the shroud of Turin having been the cloth laid on Jesus? C: Yes, it was one of many shrouds used to conceal and disguise Yeshua. The one found many centuries later survived, many others used did not.
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document. Reader feedback humbly requested: Is it better to include the day's post the "old" way, as I've been doing until now, or do it this way? This way = as follows below and very shortly.
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document. What and who is or are the PCH? Why, the backwards name of our human colleagues the HCPs, given a good mention in this short video. (2 minutes 20 seconds) Here's the shared video mentioned in RB's comment:
Recent reader questions.
A reader sends this article exploring control of The Moon. Says The Committee:
"From the headline onwards, the article speculates human attempts to impose human ideas & preference where these do and shall not apply. As you have already read in the article, the implicit assumption is no control over your planet's satellite exists, which is not the case. Nearly immediately upon developing capability to visit your planet's satellite with ease, humans would be told about long existing agreements already in effect. Humans would be accommodated; however no human dominance would be allowed. Humans fancy the notion of property ownership, but this is only a name for control over use. Such systems work only if other potential entrants, tenants or users of surface areas on planets agree to follow the systems established by all interested parties. Ultimate control rests with power and willingness to use it, as both human history and current practice continue to reveal. This extends across your galaxy. Visitors-To-Earth have used your planet's satellite continuously and will continue. How humans shall be accommodated will turn on your requests, needs, abilities and the effects proposed human activity might have upon the long-established activities and uses of your planet's satellite, at the time you might ask for participation. This choice remains for humans to make, when the opportunity arises." |